Search results for query: *

Been a long time since I've heard those names.

Another good point!

Yes! Exactly. There are a lot of "breeders" that just smash animals together to create more to sell. Their purpose of breeding is to sell. Then there are breeders that take pride in what they do and have other purposes other than just selling.

No, not all credit would go to the originator. Credit goes to all involved. I'm speaking of something more than just credit. I'm not talking about just breeding either though as most people see it. I'm talking of creating bloodlines. Foundations. Anyone can breed. Only special dedicated people...

I guess to me it comes down to respect. No small business appreciates having their products rebranded and sold as someone else's. Unless that someone else acknowledges their work and then puts in a considerable about of effort themselves to better or change the product. Then they get the same...

If you add something to the line, you get to add your name. If you're just continuing someone else's line, no. If you took that line of MFs to a whole new level as far as pattern and conformation quality, over a period of time and they breed true etc.. Then I feel like that justifies adding...

To expand on this... Most of what a breed is, starts with a solid foundation. So, whoever is responsible for laying that foundation so to speak, would be the one putting in 90% of the effort. Not the guy that buys birds from him that are already great. That first person deserves to have their...

Could you tattoo every bird you produce and sell? That would set anyone straight if there were ever a question if you bred it. That of course would mean no egg sales as you couldn't tattoo those. So maybe not the best idea. Has to be a way around that though.

Holy tag list batman. I didn't get my alert. Neither did Moony. I think they absolutely should!